<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting Against the Misuse of the Rare, the One-of-a-Kind and the Antique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind</link>
	<description>Get the Most from Your Antiques &#38; Collectibles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-121119</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-121119</guid>
		<description>Expecting 100% accuracy and honesty on ebay is almost as wishful as expecting it in politics.  It aint happenin.  Expecting it in an &quot;antique&quot; dealer is another matter.  I collect miniature oil lamps.  Most of what I buy is 40 to 60 years old.  Some is actually over 100.  Some came off the boat from China last week.  I have some idea which is which.  I disagree with the word &quot;vintage&quot; though.Vintage is &quot;a year or period of origin.&quot;  A dealere will often mark a peice as &quot;vintage&quot; implying that it is old.  It may be vintage, but it is vintage 2012 not vintage old.  Retro is a good word.  I like that for new items that look like old.  Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expecting 100% accuracy and honesty on ebay is almost as wishful as expecting it in politics.  It aint happenin.  Expecting it in an &#8220;antique&#8221; dealer is another matter.  I collect miniature oil lamps.  Most of what I buy is 40 to 60 years old.  Some is actually over 100.  Some came off the boat from China last week.  I have some idea which is which.  I disagree with the word &#8220;vintage&#8221; though.Vintage is &#8220;a year or period of origin.&#8221;  A dealere will often mark a peice as &#8220;vintage&#8221; implying that it is old.  It may be vintage, but it is vintage 2012 not vintage old.  Retro is a good word.  I like that for new items that look like old.  Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-103721</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-103721</guid>
		<description>Michelle, et al,

I am in the process of putting together an alternative way for sellers of “Rare” and “One-of-a-Kind” items to auction their merchandise online in a more exclusive venue. One specifically devoted to truly “Rare” and “One-of-a-Kind” items. I would greatly appreciate your feedback on our venture as we are rapidly putting the finishing touches on our website as I type this.

Any thoughts you would be willing to share with us on how to create a better experience for both buyers and sellers of “Rare” and “One-of-a-Kind” items would be greatly appreciated. My web address is http://TreasureHunt.com, and our tagline is “Online Auctions of Rare and One-of-a-Kind Items.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, et al,</p>
<p>I am in the process of putting together an alternative way for sellers of “Rare” and “One-of-a-Kind” items to auction their merchandise online in a more exclusive venue. One specifically devoted to truly “Rare” and “One-of-a-Kind” items. I would greatly appreciate your feedback on our venture as we are rapidly putting the finishing touches on our website as I type this.</p>
<p>Any thoughts you would be willing to share with us on how to create a better experience for both buyers and sellers of “Rare” and “One-of-a-Kind” items would be greatly appreciated. My web address is <a href="http://TreasureHunt.com" rel="nofollow">http://TreasureHunt.com</a>, and our tagline is “Online Auctions of Rare and One-of-a-Kind Items.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Cooper Staley</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-95285</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Cooper Staley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-95285</guid>
		<description>I love it when I hit a nerve. It lets me know that I am not just being a little overly sensitive on an issue. I came across an eBay listing yesterday where the seller had 3 Dollar Store dolls listed as &#039;antique&#039; and &#039;rare&#039; the rational was that they were found in a trunk so hey, they have to be old. I sent him a comment correcting his description but we all know where my comment went.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when I hit a nerve. It lets me know that I am not just being a little overly sensitive on an issue. I came across an eBay listing yesterday where the seller had 3 Dollar Store dolls listed as &#8216;antique&#8217; and &#8216;rare&#8217; the rational was that they were found in a trunk so hey, they have to be old. I sent him a comment correcting his description but we all know where my comment went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-94761</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-94761</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail on the head with this one. 

Selling antiques remains one of the few professions where you can hit the ground running - no subject matter expertise or communication skills are required, not even the basic ability to piece together words into a sentence which describes what you are selling. 

Oh, and don&#039;t get me started on the many flea market &quot;professionals&quot; who consider personal hygiene to be completely optional ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head with this one. </p>
<p>Selling antiques remains one of the few professions where you can hit the ground running &#8211; no subject matter expertise or communication skills are required, not even the basic ability to piece together words into a sentence which describes what you are selling. </p>
<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t get me started on the many flea market &#8220;professionals&#8221; who consider personal hygiene to be completely optional &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-94744</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-94744</guid>
		<description>Yes, &quot;rare&quot; is way overused, as is &quot;unique,&quot; which usually describes some mass-produced item. Some sellers just don&#039;t seem to realize that just because the seller hasn&#039;t seen it before doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s the only one out there, or even hard to find! 

The worst  use of &quot;antique&quot; I&#039;ve recently run across was an eBay auction for &quot;2 rare spools of thread.&quot; I collect (and sell) vintage and antique sewing notions, so clicked to see what was being offered.

What I found were 2 small spools of polyester thread dating from the 1980s. They were offered at $65, plus shipping! 

I sent a note to the seller, gently telling her that these were barely (if at all) vintage, and could not be called antique. (I told her the definitions of both terms, as they are commonly used by dealers and collectors.) I also pointed out that the this type of thread can still be bought today, for very little. 

She replied that the thread had belonged to her grandmother and certainly were antique - they were &quot;at least 25 years old!&quot;

She absolutely insisted that items from the 1980s are commonly called antiques and these spools of thread were &quot;very rare.&quot; 

I noticed shortly after that she lowered her price a bit - to $50!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, &#8220;rare&#8221; is way overused, as is &#8220;unique,&#8221; which usually describes some mass-produced item. Some sellers just don&#8217;t seem to realize that just because the seller hasn&#8217;t seen it before doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the only one out there, or even hard to find! </p>
<p>The worst  use of &#8220;antique&#8221; I&#8217;ve recently run across was an eBay auction for &#8220;2 rare spools of thread.&#8221; I collect (and sell) vintage and antique sewing notions, so clicked to see what was being offered.</p>
<p>What I found were 2 small spools of polyester thread dating from the 1980s. They were offered at $65, plus shipping! </p>
<p>I sent a note to the seller, gently telling her that these were barely (if at all) vintage, and could not be called antique. (I told her the definitions of both terms, as they are commonly used by dealers and collectors.) I also pointed out that the this type of thread can still be bought today, for very little. </p>
<p>She replied that the thread had belonged to her grandmother and certainly were antique &#8211; they were &#8220;at least 25 years old!&#8221;</p>
<p>She absolutely insisted that items from the 1980s are commonly called antiques and these spools of thread were &#8220;very rare.&#8221; </p>
<p>I noticed shortly after that she lowered her price a bit &#8211; to $50!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89429</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89429</guid>
		<description>Seeing &quot;Antique Sewing Machine&quot; in a header and opening the item only to find an early 1970&#039;s plastic machine annoys me to no end!!  Thanks for the article...too bad the people who would REALLY benefit from it will never see it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing &#8220;Antique Sewing Machine&#8221; in a header and opening the item only to find an early 1970&#8242;s plastic machine annoys me to no end!!  Thanks for the article&#8230;too bad the people who would REALLY benefit from it will never see it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Mull</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89424</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Mull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89424</guid>
		<description>Ah, Michelle, et al:

THANK YOU for bringing up this topic. I am able to gloss over the &quot;rare,&quot; &quot;OOAK,&quot; and so on, now, but when I was a newbie on eBay, it was tantalizing. I actually believed people knew what they were talking about. I feel sorry for those people who still believe those terms.

To add to the list of pet peeves (which actually border on outright lies, and therefore, there has to be some illegality involved), I add, calling something by a popular name, not because it is (it isn&#039;t), but because seeing the name triggers a salivating response. Copies of roses are COPIES, not roses (my apologies, Bill). 

I found some items labeled &quot;Talavera&quot;, but the seller told me they weren&#039;t marked, just that she had &quot;sold some other items like it that were Talavera.&quot; If she knew her stuff, then she would know that that did not make her item Talavera! I think I will label myself an expert in Mexican pottery, since I toured a Talavera factory in Puebla and wrote an article about it. In 1980. That&#039;s current, isn&#039;t it? Hey, everybody, look at me! I&#039;m an expert!

&quot;Catty or hateful&quot;?! How about &quot;realistic&quot; and &quot;alert&quot; and &quot;responsible&quot;? Those adverbs are far more appropriate for your article.

Thanks, Michelle. Keep doing what you&#039;re doing. You&#039;re refreshing, and you give me hope.

Lisa
Lisa&#039;s Bits &amp; Collectibles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Michelle, et al:</p>
<p>THANK YOU for bringing up this topic. I am able to gloss over the &#8220;rare,&#8221; &#8220;OOAK,&#8221; and so on, now, but when I was a newbie on eBay, it was tantalizing. I actually believed people knew what they were talking about. I feel sorry for those people who still believe those terms.</p>
<p>To add to the list of pet peeves (which actually border on outright lies, and therefore, there has to be some illegality involved), I add, calling something by a popular name, not because it is (it isn&#8217;t), but because seeing the name triggers a salivating response. Copies of roses are COPIES, not roses (my apologies, Bill). </p>
<p>I found some items labeled &#8220;Talavera&#8221;, but the seller told me they weren&#8217;t marked, just that she had &#8220;sold some other items like it that were Talavera.&#8221; If she knew her stuff, then she would know that that did not make her item Talavera! I think I will label myself an expert in Mexican pottery, since I toured a Talavera factory in Puebla and wrote an article about it. In 1980. That&#8217;s current, isn&#8217;t it? Hey, everybody, look at me! I&#8217;m an expert!</p>
<p>&#8220;Catty or hateful&#8221;?! How about &#8220;realistic&#8221; and &#8220;alert&#8221; and &#8220;responsible&#8221;? Those adverbs are far more appropriate for your article.</p>
<p>Thanks, Michelle. Keep doing what you&#8217;re doing. You&#8217;re refreshing, and you give me hope.</p>
<p>Lisa<br />
Lisa&#8217;s Bits &amp; Collectibles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Watkins</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89386</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89386</guid>
		<description>Please do not blame Michelle for the typos in the tease for her article in the WorthPoint Insider. That is my fault. While preparing the newsletter for distribution, my computer crashed. When I got it back up, many of the changes I made did not save, and I failed to check to make sure the version I sent out was the final version.

I do appreciate that WorthPoint readers keeping us honest, so if you spot more mistakes, please let us know.

-- Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please do not blame Michelle for the typos in the tease for her article in the WorthPoint Insider. That is my fault. While preparing the newsletter for distribution, my computer crashed. When I got it back up, many of the changes I made did not save, and I failed to check to make sure the version I sent out was the final version.</p>
<p>I do appreciate that WorthPoint readers keeping us honest, so if you spot more mistakes, please let us know.</p>
<p>&#8211; Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Cooper Staley</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89384</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Cooper Staley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89384</guid>
		<description>I see that this article has hit a nerve with a lot of folks. We need to take a stand against the use of the words and contact sellers, especially on eBay, to correct their use of these words.

As for the grammatical errors yes I do send my articles to an editor at WorthPoint and he makes corrections, I am an antique dealer not a journalist, this sometimes includes rewording my sentence structure so that it flows better and makes it more enjoyable for you to read.

It appears that some of my sentences were restructured and something went wrong along the way. I have contacted him to go back over the article and re-edit it.

Thank you all for your comments and I always welcome suggestions for future articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that this article has hit a nerve with a lot of folks. We need to take a stand against the use of the words and contact sellers, especially on eBay, to correct their use of these words.</p>
<p>As for the grammatical errors yes I do send my articles to an editor at WorthPoint and he makes corrections, I am an antique dealer not a journalist, this sometimes includes rewording my sentence structure so that it flows better and makes it more enjoyable for you to read.</p>
<p>It appears that some of my sentences were restructured and something went wrong along the way. I have contacted him to go back over the article and re-edit it.</p>
<p>Thank you all for your comments and I always welcome suggestions for future articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89114</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89114</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget the much-abused term &#039;unique&#039;. I have seen eBay sellers use this to describe newly made stuff from China and they have several listings running at the same time for the exact same item (which doesn&#039;t exactly make them too smart in the first place).

We had a new auctioneer in our area who was big on advertising &quot;once in a lifetime chance to own this or that one of a kind&quot; items. He sure didn&#039;t last long. Hard to stay in business when every customer you ever have swears they will never come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the much-abused term &#8216;unique&#8217;. I have seen eBay sellers use this to describe newly made stuff from China and they have several listings running at the same time for the exact same item (which doesn&#8217;t exactly make them too smart in the first place).</p>
<p>We had a new auctioneer in our area who was big on advertising &#8220;once in a lifetime chance to own this or that one of a kind&#8221; items. He sure didn&#8217;t last long. Hard to stay in business when every customer you ever have swears they will never come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peeved in PA</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89048</link>
		<dc:creator>Peeved in PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89048</guid>
		<description>Brava, Michelle!  This has been a peeve of mine for a long time.  &quot;Rare&quot; is the most overused, misused word on ebay.  I do not believe that people are using it because they don&#039;t know the difference, but because they think it will increase views of their item and the price it will realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brava, Michelle!  This has been a peeve of mine for a long time.  &#8220;Rare&#8221; is the most overused, misused word on ebay.  I do not believe that people are using it because they don&#8217;t know the difference, but because they think it will increase views of their item and the price it will realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Siemers</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89027</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Siemers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89027</guid>
		<description>I too agree that these words are misused and frustrating, however it will never be stopped because the folks that use it are employing every key word they can to draw more traffic to the item. This is why the buyer needs to be informed and aware. Honest sellers will filter through all the trash talkers in time. Hopefully the frustrated customers will not buy from people that don&#039;t represent things as they should be. 

I also agree that anyone that publishes on a blog or submits for a stand up publication like Worth-Point should have items edited. This CAN be corrected unlike the misuse of terms in the article above. 

I know a very good editor that was so put out by all the mistakes found on the web and started a sideline business from it. www.smewritingservices.com and others like her are out there. Spell check will not cut it for grammar, punctuation and all the other things that make reading and writing an important communication tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too agree that these words are misused and frustrating, however it will never be stopped because the folks that use it are employing every key word they can to draw more traffic to the item. This is why the buyer needs to be informed and aware. Honest sellers will filter through all the trash talkers in time. Hopefully the frustrated customers will not buy from people that don&#8217;t represent things as they should be. </p>
<p>I also agree that anyone that publishes on a blog or submits for a stand up publication like Worth-Point should have items edited. This CAN be corrected unlike the misuse of terms in the article above. </p>
<p>I know a very good editor that was so put out by all the mistakes found on the web and started a sideline business from it. <a href="http://www.smewritingservices.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.smewritingservices.com</a> and others like her are out there. Spell check will not cut it for grammar, punctuation and all the other things that make reading and writing an important communication tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89020</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89020</guid>
		<description>Hi, it peeves me as well, I believe in most cases it is individual ignorance, I see it mainly on eBay and if the vendor took the time to look at other listings he would see that he has listed his &quot;one of a Kind&quot; etc alongside many other identical items. I just wish they would do their research before listing.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, it peeves me as well, I believe in most cases it is individual ignorance, I see it mainly on eBay and if the vendor took the time to look at other listings he would see that he has listed his &#8220;one of a Kind&#8221; etc alongside many other identical items. I just wish they would do their research before listing.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john moore</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89015</link>
		<dc:creator>john moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89015</guid>
		<description>Thanks-you, thank-you We share the same pet peeve. Rare, antique and words that denote age are commonly misused and only demonstrate ignorance by the vast users of the word....especially on Ebay  Some one once told me that rare on Ebay is defined as no longer available at Target... Humorous but too close to the truth. When young people use the word old I always inquire what they consider old. It puts us on a better level of understanding,..Thanks for helping to vent my pet peeve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks-you, thank-you We share the same pet peeve. Rare, antique and words that denote age are commonly misused and only demonstrate ignorance by the vast users of the word&#8230;.especially on Ebay  Some one once told me that rare on Ebay is defined as no longer available at Target&#8230; Humorous but too close to the truth. When young people use the word old I always inquire what they consider old. It puts us on a better level of understanding,..Thanks for helping to vent my pet peeve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upstate New York</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89003</link>
		<dc:creator>Upstate New York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89003</guid>
		<description>It is a real pet peeve of mine to receive a piece of mail from Worthpoint.Com (which I love) that has the teaser paragraph (in particular &quot;misuse of the rare....&quot; and to trip over errors such as &quot;She says that she see&quot;? &quot;customers has being misinformed?&quot;.  Should I now think of your company as you think of the misuse of &quot;rare&quot;?
Do you have an Editor or a Proof Reader?  If not, I would like to apply for the position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a real pet peeve of mine to receive a piece of mail from Worthpoint.Com (which I love) that has the teaser paragraph (in particular &#8220;misuse of the rare&#8230;.&#8221; and to trip over errors such as &#8220;She says that she see&#8221;? &#8220;customers has being misinformed?&#8221;.  Should I now think of your company as you think of the misuse of &#8220;rare&#8221;?<br />
Do you have an Editor or a Proof Reader?  If not, I would like to apply for the position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinfoilhat</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-89000</link>
		<dc:creator>tinfoilhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-89000</guid>
		<description>And if you search under &quot;OOAK&quot; you will find even more things purporting to be one of a kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you search under &#8220;OOAK&#8221; you will find even more things purporting to be one of a kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy S.</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-88995</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-88995</guid>
		<description>While most antique and collectible collectors and dealers will agree with Michelle Staley and her comments about rare and antique being over used, you should also be aware that vehicles are considered antiques when they are over 25 years old. Also and obviously, photographs from the early 1900&#039;s are NOT rare and never will be, there being many out there BUT quite obviously the seller of the rare photograph in question refers to the female dentist from this era and yes, it would be rare to have a photograph like that one. Just as there are many other rare photographs with the rarity being the subject matter or the photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While most antique and collectible collectors and dealers will agree with Michelle Staley and her comments about rare and antique being over used, you should also be aware that vehicles are considered antiques when they are over 25 years old. Also and obviously, photographs from the early 1900&#8242;s are NOT rare and never will be, there being many out there BUT quite obviously the seller of the rare photograph in question refers to the female dentist from this era and yes, it would be rare to have a photograph like that one. Just as there are many other rare photographs with the rarity being the subject matter or the photographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Mangum</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/fighting-misuse-rare-one-of-a-kind/comment-page-1#comment-88993</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mangum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2501642#comment-88993</guid>
		<description>I have an auction company and get calls all the time about &quot;antiques&quot; people would like to sell. Usually, after a few questions, I learn what they have is definitely NOT an antique. Recently someone called about their antique furniture they were interested in selling. When I asked how old they thought the items were, the lady replied, &quot;Oh, these items are old. Very old. Seems like we bought them right after we got married 35 years ago.&quot;  When asked if they were old then, she responded, &quot;No, we only bought new things back then!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an auction company and get calls all the time about &#8220;antiques&#8221; people would like to sell. Usually, after a few questions, I learn what they have is definitely NOT an antique. Recently someone called about their antique furniture they were interested in selling. When I asked how old they thought the items were, the lady replied, &#8220;Oh, these items are old. Very old. Seems like we bought them right after we got married 35 years ago.&#8221;  When asked if they were old then, she responded, &#8220;No, we only bought new things back then!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
