<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shelley Pottery – Post-War Shapes and Designs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years</link>
	<description>Get the Most from Your Antiques &#38; Collectibles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years/comment-page-1#comment-53505</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.priceminer.com/history/shelley-pottery-the-later-years#comment-53505</guid>
		<description>I have been searching the net for shelley information as I have been left a part shelley tea set and would like to know the pattern name.  I am having no luck and wonder if you can help.  The pattern number on the base is 11506.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been searching the net for shelley information as I have been left a part shelley tea set and would like to know the pattern name.  I am having no luck and wonder if you can help.  The pattern number on the base is 11506.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Lansky</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years/comment-page-1#comment-45312</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Lansky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.priceminer.com/history/shelley-pottery-the-later-years#comment-45312</guid>
		<description>Dear Chris Davenport,
Your article is informative and welcome--thank you.  I wonder if you can help me on some particulars. I&#039;ve just purchased a c&amp;s set in the lily of the valley pattern in a shape which I think is the same as the top example you show, which you describe as the Stratford shape.  Replacements has this shape noted (I believe) as Snowdrop.   Have they made a mistake?  I have seen what has been described as Snowdrop in older Wileman-Shelley sets--more scallop and more pointed handle.

Of even more interest to me is plate shapes.  I have a modest collection of Shelley c&amp;s sets which I have attempted to join to a 7&quot; or 8&quot; plate to make a trio.  With the exception of Oleander, Dainty, and Ludlow, I have seldom seen any other plate shape than Gainsborough.  Most of the time, it seems to work OK with Richmond or New Cambridge but what do you do with Ripon and Warwick and now this new one, either Stratford or Snowdrop?  Did Shelley make plates in those shapes?  If so I haven&#039;t seen any.  Is it out of place to use another shape plate with those?  Was there a separate plate made for Richmond, and New Cambridge? If so, where can I see an example so I&#039;ll recognize it when I see it.  I&#039;d really appreciate it if you could clear up that problem for me.
Best,
Hannah Lansky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Chris Davenport,<br />
Your article is informative and welcome&#8211;thank you.  I wonder if you can help me on some particulars. I&#8217;ve just purchased a c&amp;s set in the lily of the valley pattern in a shape which I think is the same as the top example you show, which you describe as the Stratford shape.  Replacements has this shape noted (I believe) as Snowdrop.   Have they made a mistake?  I have seen what has been described as Snowdrop in older Wileman-Shelley sets&#8211;more scallop and more pointed handle.</p>
<p>Of even more interest to me is plate shapes.  I have a modest collection of Shelley c&amp;s sets which I have attempted to join to a 7&#8243; or 8&#8243; plate to make a trio.  With the exception of Oleander, Dainty, and Ludlow, I have seldom seen any other plate shape than Gainsborough.  Most of the time, it seems to work OK with Richmond or New Cambridge but what do you do with Ripon and Warwick and now this new one, either Stratford or Snowdrop?  Did Shelley make plates in those shapes?  If so I haven&#8217;t seen any.  Is it out of place to use another shape plate with those?  Was there a separate plate made for Richmond, and New Cambridge? If so, where can I see an example so I&#8217;ll recognize it when I see it.  I&#8217;d really appreciate it if you could clear up that problem for me.<br />
Best,<br />
Hannah Lansky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Robins - WorthPoint, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years/comment-page-1#comment-44707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Robins - WorthPoint, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.priceminer.com/history/shelley-pottery-the-later-years#comment-44707</guid>
		<description>I found a few small black cups and saucers on our other website.  Here&#039;s an example: http://www.goantiques.com/detail,vintage-cambridge-black,2370205.html

I just searched for &quot;black cup and saucer&quot;, I hope this helps you find what you&#039;re looking for.

Sincerely,
Jason Robins
Director of Sales
WorthPoint, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a few small black cups and saucers on our other website.  Here&#8217;s an example: <a href="http://www.goantiques.com/detail,vintage-cambridge-black,2370205.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.goantiques.com/detail,vintage-cambridge-black,2370205.html</a></p>
<p>I just searched for &#8220;black cup and saucer&#8221;, I hope this helps you find what you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Jason Robins<br />
Director of Sales<br />
WorthPoint, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: de</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years/comment-page-1#comment-44602</link>
		<dc:creator>de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.priceminer.com/history/shelley-pottery-the-later-years#comment-44602</guid>
		<description>Hi

I am looking for a dainty black cup and saucer.
can you direct me in the right direction? 

thanks so much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I am looking for a dainty black cup and saucer.<br />
can you direct me in the right direction? </p>
<p>thanks so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Rosehart</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/article/shelley-pottery-the-later-years/comment-page-1#comment-6986</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Rosehart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articles.priceminer.com/history/shelley-pottery-the-later-years#comment-6986</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Davenport:
I have just read your lovely article.
We have corresponded before.  I am a Canadian who has the Margaret Rose pattern 14119 that was produced under the Lichfield backstamp (as was Bridesmaid 14099).  It would be so helpful to have this included in your article.  I don&#039;t think that &quot;Old China Patterns&quot; here in Canada, nor &quot;Replacements&quot; in the southern US which is a huge company, have any idea of the connection.  The latter has it under Lichfield since I called them years ago to try to find a replacement.  Your expertise is so important to people like me and I know this connection would be well received by many.
Kindest regards,
Margaret Rosehart, Ontario, Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Davenport:<br />
I have just read your lovely article.<br />
We have corresponded before.  I am a Canadian who has the Margaret Rose pattern 14119 that was produced under the Lichfield backstamp (as was Bridesmaid 14099).  It would be so helpful to have this included in your article.  I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;Old China Patterns&#8221; here in Canada, nor &#8220;Replacements&#8221; in the southern US which is a huge company, have any idea of the connection.  The latter has it under Lichfield since I called them years ago to try to find a replacement.  Your expertise is so important to people like me and I know this connection would be well received by many.<br />
Kindest regards,<br />
Margaret Rosehart, Ontario, Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

