<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rinker on Collectibles: America’s Cultural Landscape is in a Devolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worthpoint.com/blog-entry/rinker-collectibles-americas-cultural-landscape-devolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/blog-entry/rinker-collectibles-americas-cultural-landscape-devolution</link>
	<description>Get the Most from Your Antiques &#38; Collectibles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tosh</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/blog-entry/rinker-collectibles-americas-cultural-landscape-devolution/comment-page-1#comment-102435</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2503200#comment-102435</guid>
		<description>Darn it - I meant &quot;thought&quot; in my first sentance, not &quot;though&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn it &#8211; I meant &#8220;thought&#8221; in my first sentance, not &#8220;though&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tosh</title>
		<link>http://www.worthpoint.com/blog-entry/rinker-collectibles-americas-cultural-landscape-devolution/comment-page-1#comment-102434</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worthpoint.com/?p=2503200#comment-102434</guid>
		<description>I think this train of though is slightly off track, Harry. Cultural change can be hard to see without the passage of a good deal of time, but it&#039;s pretty clear to me that the style repersented in 1980s TV shows being rerun on cable these days is pretty different than today - vastly different in some areas in respect to clothing, slang language, even some car and home designs. I don&#039;t recall noticing big changes in the cultural landscape as the 1960s turned into the &#039;70s, but years later, it was all too obvious. I think the same thing will happen a few years down the line,as people look back at the trends and styles from the 1990s and double-ought years and think, &quot;How quaint!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this train of though is slightly off track, Harry. Cultural change can be hard to see without the passage of a good deal of time, but it&#8217;s pretty clear to me that the style repersented in 1980s TV shows being rerun on cable these days is pretty different than today &#8211; vastly different in some areas in respect to clothing, slang language, even some car and home designs. I don&#8217;t recall noticing big changes in the cultural landscape as the 1960s turned into the &#8217;70s, but years later, it was all too obvious. I think the same thing will happen a few years down the line,as people look back at the trends and styles from the 1990s and double-ought years and think, &#8220;How quaint!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
